Hey All,
I'm Jason, a 07' graduate of Webster University in St. Louis, where I actually did an independent major that basically blended video production, new media, and africana studies. I'm another aspiring feature writer/director/producer, who hopes to start up my own small production company in Chicago soon after I move up there next month. I also hope to get into for-hire music video production and distribution.
My question stems from a comment from the Financing and Funding Forum:
I was wondering if anyone could expound on this point? Why would it be more advantageous to use the Standard Contract instead of the Modified Low Budget Contract for a budget of, say, 500k?
Thanks, it's good to be here :wink:
I'm Jason, a 07' graduate of Webster University in St. Louis, where I actually did an independent major that basically blended video production, new media, and africana studies. I'm another aspiring feature writer/director/producer, who hopes to start up my own small production company in Chicago soon after I move up there next month. I also hope to get into for-hire music video production and distribution.
My question stems from a comment from the Financing and Funding Forum:
Dan Selakovich said:KimWelch said:Is scale not the same for everyone?
SAG has different contracts available depending on the budget of your film. But scale is the same whether you're a movie star or an actor with one credit. To avoid problems, I'd certainly go with the SAG standard contract if you can at all possibly afford it. The low-budget agreements can be problematic.
Dan
I was wondering if anyone could expound on this point? Why would it be more advantageous to use the Standard Contract instead of the Modified Low Budget Contract for a budget of, say, 500k?
Thanks, it's good to be here :wink: