jonboatjones
New member
Anyone out there have any difficulty getting a quality image out of their X?
I mean, I also Have a gl2, which seems to consistantly tape better looking footage than its big brother. I purchased the X because it seemed to have more image control than the gl2, better lens, XLR input capability( Of course, with the purchase of the MA 200 for a measly $350) Perhaps I am not setting it up correctly, but on two cam shoots, its a real headache to match the 2 cams. And the gl2 picture has a noticably better picture. I WB on the same card, same settings in the menus, matched custom preset values, but still, no bueno. If any one out there has experienced a similar dilema, lets see if we can figure this issue out. I don't want to have to put the gl2 behind another teleprompter again, clients kinda laugh at that. It is funny looking though. In the clients eyes, the bigger the cam, the better they feel about spending their money. (another reason I bought an XL1s)
thx for any replies,
jb
I mean, I also Have a gl2, which seems to consistantly tape better looking footage than its big brother. I purchased the X because it seemed to have more image control than the gl2, better lens, XLR input capability( Of course, with the purchase of the MA 200 for a measly $350) Perhaps I am not setting it up correctly, but on two cam shoots, its a real headache to match the 2 cams. And the gl2 picture has a noticably better picture. I WB on the same card, same settings in the menus, matched custom preset values, but still, no bueno. If any one out there has experienced a similar dilema, lets see if we can figure this issue out. I don't want to have to put the gl2 behind another teleprompter again, clients kinda laugh at that. It is funny looking though. In the clients eyes, the bigger the cam, the better they feel about spending their money. (another reason I bought an XL1s)
thx for any replies,
jb
