hello...
im buying a new camera, for around the 2000 pounds mark (4000 dollars) - and for the last two years ive been set on the Canon XL2. I understand people prefer the Panasonic dvx100 to this camera, but having used one, i dont really like the look of the footage, and i have a canon slr, so after getting the adaptor, i can use my lenses on the canon xl2.
however, now, im confused whether i should get an HD camera instead - the XH A1 looks nice, although it has no interchangable lenses. BUT - i just dont know if i really want HD. this is partly due to never having a chance to use a prosumer HD camera, and partly due to the fact i hear it takes it further away from having a "film look".
try and answer this for me please - as i have a good deal that will only be available for a short time, which includes the EF adaptor, and extender for the lens.
thanks people...
im buying a new camera, for around the 2000 pounds mark (4000 dollars) - and for the last two years ive been set on the Canon XL2. I understand people prefer the Panasonic dvx100 to this camera, but having used one, i dont really like the look of the footage, and i have a canon slr, so after getting the adaptor, i can use my lenses on the canon xl2.
however, now, im confused whether i should get an HD camera instead - the XH A1 looks nice, although it has no interchangable lenses. BUT - i just dont know if i really want HD. this is partly due to never having a chance to use a prosumer HD camera, and partly due to the fact i hear it takes it further away from having a "film look".
try and answer this for me please - as i have a good deal that will only be available for a short time, which includes the EF adaptor, and extender for the lens.
thanks people...