This week, while I was making an interview with a couple of reds I took a look to the set that a big Tv channel was putting on for another interview. The interview took place in a big room where some outdoor light was coming in trhough the window, and the cameraman used a bunch of kino and some little fresnel ( as quickers I guess), the point is that he used mixed light in his kino, daylight and tungsten balanced equaly distributed.
As I don't know if he white balanced for the average, which would have been weird (in my opinion) I think he just day balanced the cameras and so had as a result a warmer light...
Usaully when I work with video I kind of dislike mixed lights, but the point is that I find that is very difficult to have a pure source (mostly if you're doing ENG)..
The question would be why not use daylight sources for the overall light and then gel some fill light with a little bit of ambar or something... if it's another way to achieve the same result (but easier to control)...but maybe I'm wrong and I did misunderstood the cameraman's intentions
As I don't know if he white balanced for the average, which would have been weird (in my opinion) I think he just day balanced the cameras and so had as a result a warmer light...
Usaully when I work with video I kind of dislike mixed lights, but the point is that I find that is very difficult to have a pure source (mostly if you're doing ENG)..
The question would be why not use daylight sources for the overall light and then gel some fill light with a little bit of ambar or something... if it's another way to achieve the same result (but easier to control)...but maybe I'm wrong and I did misunderstood the cameraman's intentions