D
Digigenic
Guest
Alright, you heard it here first...I'm infatuated with the Arri 235.
As many of you know, and obviously as my name would so eloquently indicate, I'm into digital. Don't do film. However, I’ve always admired the beauty of film and tried my hardest, pathetically so, to get my digital images to look like film. I'm posting with regard to the Arri 235 because I'm utterly infatuated with this camera’s cost inhibitive position to keep the dream of shooting an indie on 35mm alive. I'm putting this question out there so that I might get some feedback from cinematographers on this particular cam, and if there's anything in particular about this camera that you do or don't agree with and why.
Thanks 8)
As many of you know, and obviously as my name would so eloquently indicate, I'm into digital. Don't do film. However, I’ve always admired the beauty of film and tried my hardest, pathetically so, to get my digital images to look like film. I'm posting with regard to the Arri 235 because I'm utterly infatuated with this camera’s cost inhibitive position to keep the dream of shooting an indie on 35mm alive. I'm putting this question out there so that I might get some feedback from cinematographers on this particular cam, and if there's anything in particular about this camera that you do or don't agree with and why.
Thanks 8)
