I'm curious about composing shots so that when they are cut together the viewer's eyes stay focused in one area of the screen, vs. racing around to find the next shot, in other words, match cut or semi-match cuts.
Example, using rule of 3rds: actor A, CU, eyes near top 1/3 horizontal line, offset to camera left facing right, cut to next shot: actor B, CU, eyes top 1/3 horizontal but on camera right causes viewers to ping pong left to right... now if the two actors are closer (lets say this is a 2.39:1 aspect because it's the most difficult, for me!) then it's possible the eyes line up horizontally and are on the same approximate vertical axis so that when cuts occur there is little to no viewer ping pong activity. I know this might seem picky, but to me it seems like a nice ability to use whenever appropiate.
Daniel Arijon's book, "Grammar of the Film Language" mentions this as well as some writings by some old time editors. Viewer eye movement on a huge screen vs. a TV is quite a bit different so the TV is relaltively immediate while the Large screen requires search & recoginiton time.
I can understand the need to use contrast in shot structure so some sequences flow like glass while others are abrupt and seemingly discontinous.
The normal coverage process doesn't seem to account for this but I know some directors story board and spend much time on these considerations.
Do you or others (cinematographers & directors, editors) take this into consideration while framing and planning shots?
Any tips?
JT.
Example, using rule of 3rds: actor A, CU, eyes near top 1/3 horizontal line, offset to camera left facing right, cut to next shot: actor B, CU, eyes top 1/3 horizontal but on camera right causes viewers to ping pong left to right... now if the two actors are closer (lets say this is a 2.39:1 aspect because it's the most difficult, for me!) then it's possible the eyes line up horizontally and are on the same approximate vertical axis so that when cuts occur there is little to no viewer ping pong activity. I know this might seem picky, but to me it seems like a nice ability to use whenever appropiate.
Daniel Arijon's book, "Grammar of the Film Language" mentions this as well as some writings by some old time editors. Viewer eye movement on a huge screen vs. a TV is quite a bit different so the TV is relaltively immediate while the Large screen requires search & recoginiton time.
I can understand the need to use contrast in shot structure so some sequences flow like glass while others are abrupt and seemingly discontinous.
The normal coverage process doesn't seem to account for this but I know some directors story board and spend much time on these considerations.
Do you or others (cinematographers & directors, editors) take this into consideration while framing and planning shots?
Any tips?
JT.